![]() |
| Who could ask for more? |
Anyway, the
story of Mount Pelee, a volcano on Martinique, has come to mind a few times
during this our world’s coronavirus spring.
The version I was told that
day on the tour was that back in 1902, there were signs that the usually quiet
Pelee was going to erupt. But would it really erupt? Was there really
an imminent danger to the city below? Or were folks overreacting when they
spoke of evacuation?
The mayor
of the city was concerned because election day was upon them. He was being advised
to have the townspeople leave, but then again, what a hassle that would make of
the elections! What if the danger were not so imminent? What if everyone got
mad at him for disrupting their lives, their jobs, forcing expenses as they
moved out and moved back, especially if the volcano ended up not erupting? What
a mess that would be.
But, what if evacuation
could be delayed? Pelee had not erupted in any of their lifetimes, what
were the chances it would blow soon? The mayor decided to wait until after
elections.
Wrong choice.
Mount
Pelee blew! Its top went from solid to gas spewing onto the land below.
The entire city burned, melted, evaporated. On
the tour, seventy-eight years later, we stood on the very few bricks that remained.
Of the rest of the bricks, the rest of the town there was nothing left!
It was
said that the only survivor of the city of nearly 30,000 people was a prisoner
whose cell was mostly underground on the outskirts of the town. In Wikipedia today,
there is mention of a girl who took a boat upstream to a cave and also
survived. But no one else – not even the mayor.
And of
course, what is going on today reminds me of the story of Mount Pelee
and the mayor. It is so hard for our present day governors and mayors to decide
which course of action is best. Should everyone be quarantined, or should they
be allowed to go about their daily lives or should some limited activity in between
those two extremes be agreed upon? Is quarantine an overkill? Will no or
limited quarantine indeed kill?
These decisions are
difficult, and not because the governors and mayors are worried about
reelection, (I, perhaps naively, would like to believe), but rather they are truly
wanting to do what is best for all their constituents. And the choices
are not pretty – enforce a quarantine and incur the wrath of those who believe
the dangers aren’t that great and hold our officials responsible for our personal
monetary losses, or take a chance and go without quarantine and be
responsible for the many more deaths that might occur!
It is tough to know
when the danger is really really real. And yet if we end up waiting a moment
too long, a hundred years from now, people could be taking a tour of our
hometowns, standing on a couple of bricks and being told that everything else had
evaporated in an instant.
(prints from Library of Congress, I think it is okay to use them?)
20200404 46 Dangers Evaporating


No comments:
Post a Comment